΢��ҕ�l

Unfortunately, due to the high demand for statistical advice that is not always possible. I am usually able to see people within 1-2 weeks. If you know you have a deadline to meet, please plan in advance.

It helps if you give a brief descriptionof your�� problem in advance by e-mail. Bringing along relevant documents and files also helps to make the discussion more concrete and therefore efficient.

The service is free to the students and staff of the ΢��ҕ�l. The appointments are usually for a maximum of 1 hour. Follow-up sessions are possible. However, if you require a lot of guidance regularly, you might want to consider tutoring or co-supervision arrangement.

The service is free to the students and staff of the ΢��ҕ�l. The appointments are usually for a maximum of 1 hour. Follow-up sessions are possible. However, if you require a lot of guidance regularly, you might want to consider tutoring or co-supervision arrangement.

Please enquire at the��mathematics and statistics��reception or email��MathStatsEnquiries@canterbury.ac.nz, as they have a list of available tutors.

The best time to see a statistician is before you collect your data. Experimental design is a key stage of any research.

The choice of statistical software depends on your personal preference and on the common usage among your colleagues. Some of the most common programs are��,��,��, and��. R is free and probably the most flexible/widely applicable statistical software around.����is a good statistical package for Bayesian inference. Excel is not statistical software.

It is important to take a good look at your data. Make as many scatterplots, tables, histograms, maps as you can. ΢��ҕ�l them, get a feel of interactions, look out for patterns and strange observations. It is also important to have a list of questions, as specific as possible, which can be answered statistically. For example, a question: “Is school A different from school B?” is not precise enough, because it is unclear what it is you are going to compare (students’ heights, teachers’ age, wall colour?…) While a question: “Do students in school A have generally higher grades in math than those in school B?” is something, which can be answered using statistical methodology.

Some statistical models, such as linear regression and, in particular, ANOVA, require normality of residuals. If your residuals are not normally distributed, you may consider transformation of the response variable. Note, that transformation does not always solve the problem, so you should recheck diagnostics after fitting the new model.

You can either use non-parametric methods or opt for new parametric methods which are more robust with respect to non-normality.

Firstly, our hypotheses, no matter how well thought out, cannot always be correct, and therefore sometimes there is simply no effect to be found. Sometimes, statistical significance may be increased by collecting additional observations or using more powerful statistical methods. Finally, statistical significance simply tells you that there is a non-zero effect or difference. Given a large enough sample, almost any tiny effect will be statistically significant. But non-zero does not always mean ‘practically interesting’.

While, causality is still a subject of many philosophical discussions, statistics is primarily the study of associations. Two variables may be highly correlated without a causal relationship. Higher sales of ice cream may be associated with higher incidence of drowning, but that is not because ice cream causes drowning. (It is because on hot days more people go for a swim and more people buy ice cream).

R-squared is generally not a good tool for model comparison, because it will increase with the number of parameters. There exist various statistical tests depending on the particular type of models you want to compare. One of the most generally useful measures is Akaike’s Information Criterion (AIC). It can be used to compare any two models fitted to the same data set. The smaller the values of AIC, the better is the model. A difference of 3 is generally considered ‘suggestive’ and a difference of 7 ‘significant’.